IEEE JSTARS 2026 · Volume 19

PCFootprint

A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for
Vectorized Building Footprint Extraction
From Aerial LiDAR Point Clouds

Haoyuan Shen†· Kuihao Wang†· Ruisheng Wang*· Yujun Liu*

School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University

† Equal contribution    * Corresponding authors

IEEE JSTARS 19, 26525–26539 · DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3715686

Maps of Estonia showing building density, dataset tile distribution, regional building counts, and LiDAR scenes with footprint annotations.
From real aerial LiDAR to vectorized building footprints.
Geographic coverage and representative scenes across Estonia. Click the figure to explore it at full resolution.
33,000Point cloud tiles
227,264Building instances
540.67 km²Geographic coverage
3,000Cross-domain test tiles

01 / The research

Abstract

Building footprint extraction is a fundamental task in photogrammetry, remote sensing, and computer vision. Recent image-based methods have achieved remarkable progress in extracting vectorized footprints from high-resolution optical imagery. However, optical imagery is inherently susceptible to occlusions, perspective distortions, and residual relief displacement, yielding incomplete or misaligned extractions. Furthermore, the lack of explicit elevation information limits its direct applicability to level of detail building modeling.

To overcome these fundamental limitations, we present PCFootprint, the first large-scale public dataset dedicated to building footprint extraction from real aerial laser scanning point clouds. Significantly surpassing existing LiDAR-based datasets in scale, PCFootprint comprises 33,000 tiles featuring systematically aligned vectorized annotations across diverse urban and rural landscapes. Furthermore, in order to push the robustness of future algorithms, we construct a unique 3,000-tile cross-domain benchmark to evaluate model generalization across unseen geographic regions.

Comprehensive evaluations of mainstream methods reveal critical unresolved challenges in the 3-D domain, including high intraclass variance, severe data imbalance, and noise in complex geospatial environments. As a comprehensive public benchmark, we believe PCFootprint will facilitate future research in 3-D building modeling, urban scene understanding, and geospatial analysis.

02 / The dataset

Real geometry. Diverse landscapes.

Airborne laser scanning point clouds paired with aligned vectorized building footprints, spanning urban and rural environments in Estonia.

A benchmark built for generalization

The Mainland subset provides 24,000 training, 3,000 validation, and 3,000 test tiles. A geographically distinct Islands subset contains 3,000 test tiles from Saaremaa and Hiiumaa for zero-shot cross-domain evaluation.

Tile extent
128 × 128 m
Data
ALS point clouds
Annotations
Vectorized polygons · MS-COCO format
Point spacing
0.22–1.09 m
License
CC BY 4.0
Explore the dataset on Hugging Face ↗
County-level tile counts by training, validation, Mainland test and Islands test split.
Tile distribution by county and dataset split (Figure 9).

Download & organization

The release contains Mainland and Islands point clouds alongside footprint annotation files. The dataset is distributed as a multipart ZIP archive on Hugging Face; download all parts before extraction. See the dataset card for file details.

PCFootprint/
├── Mainland/
│   ├── pointcloud/
│   └── <train|test|val>.json
└── Islands/
    ├── pointcloud/
    └── test.json

03 / The benchmark

Beyond the training region.

A unified comparison of pixelwise segmentation and polygonal regression methods, evaluated on both Mainland and unseen Islands scenes.

Selected results from Table V of the paper. mAP (%); higher is better.
MethodParadigmMainlandIslands (zero-shot)
MFNetPixelwise segmentation49.833.2
P2PFormerPolygonal regression46.340.8
SAMPolyBuildPolygonal regression47.644.7

Polygonal regression retains sharper boundaries and shows stronger cross-region robustness, while sparse sampling, vegetation occlusion, and complex urban morphology remain challenging.

Qualitative building footprint extraction comparison across Mainland and Islands scenes, including point clouds, ground truth, and method predictions.
Qualitative comparison from Figure 11. Open the figure for a closer view of footprint boundaries.

04 / Cite this work

Citation

If you use PCFootprint in your research, please cite our paper.

@article{shen2026pcfootprint,
  title   = {PCFootprint: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for
             Vectorized Building Footprint Extraction From
             Aerial LiDAR Point Clouds},
  author  = {Shen, Haoyuan and Wang, Kuihao and Wang, Ruisheng
             and Liu, Yujun},
  journal = {IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth
             Observations and Remote Sensing},
  volume  = {19},
  pages   = {26525--26539},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3715686}
}

Acknowledgements

We thank the Estonian Land and Spatial Development Board for the open LiDAR and geospatial data used to develop PCFootprint. The paper and dataset are released under CC BY 4.0. Figures on this page are reproduced from the paper.